homeaboutwhysteveissuescontact

Contributeline

News & Events lineContributea

News & Events a 2.20.2010

10th District List of Candidates

read more>

a

2.19.2010

There will be a Petition Signing Party for Dr. Steven A. Solieri, CPA.

read more>

a

2.18.2010

GOP Lincoln Day Dinner

Solieri has done extensive research into Chris Carney’s House record, and says the bills the Congressman has voted for, including the hot-button health care bill

read more >

a

2.12.2010

The Scranton Times-Tribune: Debt ceiling soars

Imagine you own a home with a mortgage and you also have an equity line of credit. When you need money to pay bills...

read more >

a

2.5.2010

Another 10th CD Candidate

"Steven Solieri is an accountant that lives in Lake Ariel that has a number crunching business in New Hyde Park, NY and Lake Ariel and is a Professor of Accounting at Queens College in New York City who has a Ph.D. and 4 Masters Degrees..."

read more >

a

2.4.2010

10th District GOP Race Shapes Up

"Solieri is marketing himself as a conservative non-politician, a financial expert

read more >

a

1.23.2010

The New Misery Index
Professors Steven A. Solieri, CPA (Queens College, C.U.N.Y.) and Petros E. Ioannatos (Kettering University, Flint, MI) are working on a paper to develop a New Misery Index similar to the one proposed by Former President Reagan. The New Misery Index is a three-tiered economic measure with one component measuring the state of the “Financial Crisis” (The Loan Delinquency Rate). The other two measures focus on one traditional measure (Unemployment) and the last measure focuses upon the inter-generational wealth transfer occurring from current fiscal policies (The Government Budget Deficit as a Percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)).

read more >
a

1.18.2010

The Scranton Times-Tribune: OBAMA and DEMOCRATS CUT A DEAL WITH THE UNIONS TO DELAY TAXES

read more >

 

Linksa

Hot Air

Sean Hannity

The Mark Levin Show

Rush Limbaugh

SolieriCPAs.com

Carneymustgo.com

The New Misery Index

Professors Steven A. Solieri, CPA (Queens College, C.U.N.Y.) and Petros E. Ioannatos (Kettering University, Flint, MI) are working on a paper to develop a New Misery Index similar to the one proposed by Former President Reagan. The New Misery Index is a three-tiered economic measure with one component measuring the state of the “Financial Crisis” (The Loan Delinquency Rate). The other two measures focus on one traditional measure (Unemployment) and the last measure focuses upon the inter-generational wealth transfer occurring from current fiscal policies (The Government Budget Deficit as a Percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)). Simply the formula is:

Misery Index =
Unemployment Rate + Loan Delinquency Rate + Government Budget Deficit as a % of GDP

History of the Misery Index
Former President Reagan devised the “Misery Index” in 1980 that was a combination of the Unemployment Rate and the Inflation Rate added together. Candidate Reagan demonstrated that during the watch of his opponent, President Carter, the index was rising indicating that the measure of misery for the American people was rising.
During President Carter’s time in office the average Misery Index was 20.27 and the increase between the start and end of his time in office was 7.00 (see Appendix A). While President Carter did have the highest average, by far (over five points), of any president he did not have the highest increase in the Misery Index over his time in office. This dubious distinction goes to President Nixon.
            The Misery Index was a convenient political tool that was easily calculated and eventually became a well-known and quoted formula to most astute American and political junkies. The impact on the Carter-Reagan 1980 election was substantial. It lead to then Candidate Reagan’s well known question: “Are you better off than you were four years ago”. Candidate Reagan answered his own question with the Misery Index.
            While the Misery index was a simple tool and served the need to easily communicate the state of the economy to the American People, it was not a broad measure of economic activity, although it met the political expediency for which it was created. 
In an effort to develop a better measure of the items important to Americans today and fitting the economic climate in which we find ourselves today, Professors Solieri & Ioannatos have developed this new index. This index is supposed to capture and communicate a modern-day economic snapshot of the economy and the potential hardships placed on the U.S. economy by expansionary fiscal policy in terms of the recent increases in government spending.  

The New Misery Index
The new index proposed by Dr. Solieri and Dr. Ioannatos is composed of three components:

Misery Index =
   Unemployment Rate + Loan Delinquency Rate + Government Budget Deficit as a % GDP

  1. The Average of the Monthly Unemployment Rate (there are two often quoted measures of labor underutilization published by the BLS the U-3 “Total Unemployed” (Appendix C-1) and U-6 “Total Unemployed, Underemployed and Discouraged Workers” Appendix C-2));
  2. The Average of the Quarterly Loan Delinquency Rate of All Borrowings in the Economy (all delinquencies include those on Residential and Commercial Real Estate, Consumer Loans including Credit Cards, Leases, Commercial and Industrial Loans, and Agricultural Loans-Appendix D). Delinquencies are a better measure than foreclosures because their data is provided in real-time with little to no lag time and are netted against recoveries to ensure that such amounts are not overstated. The data is published by the Federal Reserve Bank quarterly and includes data from all banks. Using the delinquency rates instead of foreclosures removes the skewing of statistics as a result of legislation designed to delay the foreclosure processes of the banks other lenders; 
  3. The Government Annual Budget Deficit as a Percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as published by the U.S. Treasury (Appendix B).

 

The Average of the Monthly Unemployment Rate (Appendix C-1 and C-2) is a measure of current economic activity that directly affects all Americans with the exception of the very old (retired senior citizens) and the very young (children and children in school through college age) and is critical to most voting Americans. The Average of the Quarterly Delinquency Rate of All Borrowings in the Economy (Appendix D) represents a broad measure of the state of the Financial Crisis in the U.S. economy today and is a much broader measury of economic misery and hardship than just foreclosures. The Government Annual Budget Deficit as a Percentage of the Gross Domestic Product (Appendix B) is a measure of the inter-generational wealth transfers occurring as a result of fiscal policies of the Federal Government.

Examples of the New Misery Index
For example the New Misery Index for the period 2001 through 2009 is calculated as follows:

 

 

Year

 

 

Description

 

Unemployment

Rate1

 

Delinquency

Rate2

Deficit as a % of GDP3

New Misery

Index

2009

Using Unemployment U-3

9.2750

6.3400a

12.9300

22.2050

2009

Using Unemployment U-6

16.3000

6.3400a

12.9300

35.5700

2008

Using Unemployment U-3

5.8167

3.6500

3.2400

12.7067

2008

Using Unemployment U-6

10.6000

3.6500

3.2400

17.4900

2007

Using Unemployment U-3

4.6083

2.0600

1.1700

7.8383

2007

Using Unemployment U-6

8.3000

2.0600

1.1700

11.5300

2006

Using Unemployment U-3

4.6083

1.5700

1.9000

8.0783

2006

Using Unemployment U-6

8.2000

1.5700

1.9000

11.6700

2005

Using Unemployment U-3

5.0833

1.5700

2.5800

9.2333

2005

Using Unemployment U-6

8.9000

1.5700

2.5800

13.0500

2004

Using Unemployment U-3

5.5417

1.8000

3.5600

10.9017

2004

Using Unemployment U-6

9.6000

1.8000

3.5600

14.9600

2003

Using Unemployment U-3

5.9917

2.3300

3.4700

11.7917

2003

Using Unemployment U-6

10.1000

2.3300

3.4700

15.9000

2002

Using Unemployment U-3

5.7833

2.6900

1.5200

9.9933

2002

Using Unemployment U-6

9.6000

2.6900

1.5200

13.8100

2001

Using Unemployment U-3

4.7417

2.6100

-1.2700

6.0817

2001

Using Unemployment U-6

8.1000

2.6100

-1.2700

9.4400

Notes:
1 The Average of the Monthly Unemployment Rates used are the U3 and U6 Unemployment Rates as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm), these are the most quoted rates in the popular media and are defined below:
U-3 is the Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate)
U-6 Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers.

2 The Delinquency Rates are published by the Federal Reserve Bank and represent the Average of the Quarterly Total Loans and Leases Column (extreme right) for the year. The source can be found at:  http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/chargeoff/delallsa.htm
3 The Deficit as a percentage of GDP represents the inter-generational commitments on future generation based on current policy and action and is taken from the site: http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_deficit_chart.html

a The Delinquency Rate for the Year 2009 includes data only from the first three quarters as published and available on 01/15/2010.  

Conclusion
It is clear from examining the New Misery Index that the rate of financial misery has nearly doubled as measured by the U-3 Unemployment Statistic in 2009 and it has more than doubled in 2009 utilizing the U-6 broader statistic. Since these measures represent fiscal actions in real-time, the expansionary fiscal policy of the Federal Government does not appear to have impacted the economy in a favorable manner. The same applies for the policies of the Federal Reserve System which has been implementing expansionary monetary policy for quite some time.
            This New Misery Index will be kept up during the ensuing quarters and years and will be directly tied to the actions of the Federal Government as well as to the policies of the Federal Reserve.  

APPENDIX A - THE “ORIGINAL” MISERY INDEX OVER TIME

Misery index - era by U.S president


Index = Unemployment rate + Inflation rate

Rank

President

Time Period

Average

Low

High

Start

End

Change

5

Harry Truman 

1948–1952

7.88

Dec 1952 = 3.45

Jan 1948 = 13.63

13.63

3.45

-10.28

1

Dwight D. Eisenhower
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower was a five-star general in the United States Army and the 34th President of the United States, from 1953 until 1961. During the Second World War, he served as Supreme Commander of the Allied forces in Europe, with responsibility for planning and supervising the...

 

1953–1960

6.26

Jul 1953 = 2.97

Apr 1958 = 10.98

3.28

7.96

4.68

3

John F. Kennedy
John F. Kennedy
John Fitzgerald "Jack" Kennedy , often referred to by his initials JFK, was the 35th President of the United States, serving from 1961 until his assassination in 1963....

 

1961–1962

7.14

Jul 1962 = 6.40

Jul 1961 = 8.38

8.31

6.82

-1.49

2

Lyndon B. Johnson
Lyndon B. Johnson
Lyndon Baines Johnson , served as the 36th President of the United States from 1963 to 1969 after his service as the Vice President of the United States from 1961 to 1963...

 

1963–1968

6.77

Nov 1965 = 5.70

Jul 1968 = 8.19

7.02

8.12

1.10

7

Richard Nixon
Richard Nixon
Richard Milhous Nixon was the 37th President of the United States and is the only president to resign the office. He was also the 36th Vice President of the United States ....

 

1969–1973

10.57

Jan 1968 = 7.80

Dec 1973 = 13.61

7.80

17.01

9.21

10

Gerald Ford
Gerald Ford
Gerald Rudolph Ford, Jr. was the 38th President of the United States, serving from 1974 to 1977, and the 40th Vice President of the United States serving from 1973 to 1974...

 

1974–1976

14.93

Dec 1976 = 12.66

Jan 1975 = 19.90

16.36

12.66

-3.70

Source: http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Misery_index_(economics)

Rank

President

Time Period

Average

Low

High

Start

End

Change

11

Jimmy Carter
Jimmy Carter
James Earl "Jimmy" Carter, Jr. served as the 39th President of the United States from 1977 to 1981 and was the recipient of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize, the only U.S. President to have received the Prize after leaving office...

 

1977–1980

20.27

Apr 1978 = 12.60

Jun 1980 = 21.98

12.72

19.72

7.00

9

Ronald Reagan
Ronald Reagan
Ronald Wilson Reagan was the 40th President of the United States and the 33rd Governor of California .Born in Tampico, Illinois, Reagan moved to Los Angeles, California in the 1930s...

 

1981–1988

11.19

Dec 1986 = 7.70

Sep 1981 = 19.33

19.99

9.72

-10.27

8

George H. W. Bush
George H. W. Bush
George Herbert Walker Bush was the 41st President of the United States . He was also Ronald Reagan's Vice President , a congressman, an ambassador, and Director of Central Intelligence....

 

1989–1992

9.68

Sep 1989 = 9.64

Nov 1990 = 12.47

10.07

10.30

+0.23

4

Bill Clinton
Bill Clinton
William Jefferson "Bill" Clinton was the 42nd President of the United States from 1993 to 2001. He was the third-youngest president; only Theodore Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy were younger when entering office...

 

1993–2000

8.80

Apr 1998 = 5.74

Jan 1993 = 10.56

10.56

7.29

-3.27

6

George W. Bush
George W. Bush
George Walker Bush was the 43rd President of the United States from 2001 to 2009 and the 46th Governor of Texas from 1995 to 2000....

 

2001–2008

8.10

Oct 2006 = 5.71

Aug 2008 = 11.47

7.93

7.29

-0.64

N/A

Barack Obama
Barack Obama
Barack Hussein Obama II is the 44th and current President of the United States. He is the first African American to hold the office, as well as the first president born in Hawaii...

 

2009–Present

8.00
Incomplete data

July 2009 = 7.30

Feb 2009 = 8.34

7.63

N/A
(8.22 Aug 2009)

0.59

Source: http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Misery_index_(economics)

 

APPENDIX B – THE DEFICIT as a PERCENTAGE of GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT

 

 

Deficit as a % GDP

 

YEAR

GDP (in $ B)

DEFICIT

(SURPLUS as Minus)

DEFICIT as a % of GDP

2000

9,749.10

-236.24

-2.42

2001

10,058.20

-128.24

-1.27

2002

10,398.40

157.75

1.52

2003

10,886.20

377.59

3.47

2004

11,607.00

412.73

3.56

2005

12,339.00

318.34

2.58

2006

13,090.80

248.19

1.90

2007

13,715.70

160.70

1.17

2008

14,165.60

458.55

3.24

2009

14,240.20

1,841.19

12.93

2010

14,728.80

1,258.44

8.54

Totals

134,979.00

4,869.00

35.22

 

Source: http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_deficit_chart.html

 

 

 

APPENDIX C-1 - BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS

LABOR FORCE STATISTICS FROM THE CURRENT POPULATION SURVEY

 

AVERAGE MONTHLY UNEMPLOYMENT RATE BY YEAR – “U-3” DEFINITION - SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

 

Year

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Average

Monthly

1999

4.3

4.4

4.2

4.3

4.2

4.3

4.3

4.2

4.2

4.1

4.1

4.0

4.2167

2000

4.0

4.1

4.0

3.8

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.1

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9667

2001

4.2

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.3

4.5

4.6

4.9

5.0

5.3

5.5

5.7

4.7417

2002

5.7

5.7

5.7

5.9

5.8

5.8

5.8

5.7

5.7

5.7

5.9

6.0

5.7833

2003

5.8

5.9

5.9

6.0

6.1

6.3

6.2

6.1

6.1

6.0

5.8

5.7

5.9917

2004

5.7

5.6

5.8

5.6

5.6

5.6

5.5

5.4

5.4

5.5

5.4

5.4

5.5417

2005

5.3

5.4

5.2

5.2

5.1

5.0

5.0

4.9

5.0

5.0

5.0

4.9

5.0833

2006

4.7

4.8

4.7

4.7

4.6

4.6

4.7

4.7

4.5

4.4

4.5

4.4

4.6083

2007

4.6

4.5

4.4

4.5

4.4

4.6

4.6

4.6

4.7

4.7

4.7

5.0

4.6083

2008

5.0

4.8

5.1

5.0

5.4

5.5

5.8

6.1

6.2

6.6

6.9

7.4

5.8167

2009

7.7

8.2

8.6

8.9

9.4

9.5

9.4

9.7

9.8

10.1

10.0

10.0

9.2750

 

Source:

http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=LNS14000000

 

 

U-3 Definition: Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate) [BLS]

 

APPENDIX C-2 - BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS

LABOR FORCE STATISTICS FROM THE CURRENT POPULATION SURVEY

 

AVERAGE MONTHLY UNEMPLOYMENT RATE BY YEAR – “U-6” DEFINITION - SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

 

Year

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Average Monthly

1999

7.7

7.7

7.6

7.6

7.4

7.5

7.5

7.3

7.4

7.2

7.1

7.1

7.4

2000

7.1

7.2

7.1

6.9

7.1

7.0

7.0

7.1

7.0

6.8

7.1

6.9

7.0

2001

7.3

7.4

7.3

7.4

7.5

7.9

7.8

8.1

8.7

9.3

9.4

9.6

8.1

2002

9.5

9.5

9.4

9.7

9.5

9.5

9.6

9.6

9.6

9.6

9.7

9.8

9.6

2003

10.0

10.2

10.0

10.2

10.1

10.3

10.3

10.1

10.4

10.2

10.0

9.8

10.1

2004

9.9

9.7

10.0

9.6

9.6

9.5

9.5

9.4

9.4

9.7

9.4

9.2

9.6

2005

9.3

9.3

9.1

8.9

8.9

9.0

8.8

8.9

9.0

8.7

8.7

8.6

8.9

2006

8.4

8.4

8.2

8.1

8.2

8.4

8.5

8.4

8.0

8.2

8.1

8.0

8.2

2007

8.3

8.1

8.0

8.2

8.2

8.2

8.3

8.5

8.4

8.4

8.5

8.8

8.3

2008

9.1

8.9

9.0

9.2

9.7

10.0

10.5

10.9

11.2

11.9

12.8

13.7

10.6

2009

14.0

15.0

15.6

15.8

16.4

16.5

16.4

16.8

17.0

17.4

17.2

17.3

16.3

 

 

Source: http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet

 

U-6 Definition: Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers

 

APPENDIX D-CHARGE-OFF and DELINQUENCY RATES – FEDERAL RESERVE BANK – SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

 

Year/

Quarter 

Real estate loans

Consumer loans

Leases

C&I Loans

Agricultural Loans

Total Loans and Leases

All

Residential 1

Commercial 2

All

Credit cards

Other

2009: Q3

9.12 

9.81 

8.74 

4.76 

6.58 

3.68 

2.63 

4.40 

2.57 

7.03 

2009: Q2

8.21 

8.72 

7.85 

4.86 

6.69 

3.68 

2.38 

3.75 

2.14 

6.41 

2009: Q1

7.07 

7.75 

6.45 

4.66 

6.49 

3.52 

2.10 

3.13 

1.75 

5.57 

2008: Q4

5.87 

6.33 

5.48 

4.24 

5.66 

3.34 

1.81 

2.59 

1.43 

4.65 

2008: Q3

4.95 

5.33 

4.74 

3.74 

4.84 

3.09 

1.64 

1.77 

1.19 

3.76 

2008: Q2

4.21 

4.40 

4.15 

3.56 

4.86 

2.79 

1.53 

1.75 

1.10 

3.33 

2008: Q1

3.53 

3.68 

3.46 

3.49 

4.75 

2.76 

1.37 

1.43 

1.08 

2.85 

2007: Q4

2.89 

3.04 

2.75 

3.40 

4.61 

2.65 

1.33 

1.32 

1.14 

2.46 

2007: Q3

2.42 

2.81 

2.00 

3.21 

4.44 

2.50 

1.19 

1.21 

1.15 

2.16 

2007: Q2

2.00 

2.30 

1.63 

3.00 

3.99 

2.36 

1.04 

1.18 

1.35 

1.87 

2007: Q1

1.77 

2.03 

1.42 

2.93 

3.97 

2.29 

1.21 

1.19 

1.18 

1.73 

2006: Q4

1.70 

1.94 

1.32 

2.94 

3.97 

2.27 

1.29 

1.16 

1.19 

1.69 

2006: Q3

1.50 

1.77 

1.14 

2.97 

4.14 

2.29 

1.33 

1.25 

1.08 

1.59 

2006: Q2

1.38 

1.62 

1.02 

2.92 

4.12 

2.16 

1.14 

1.29 

1.06 

1.51 

2006: Q1

1.36 

1.59 

1.01 

2.78 

3.85 

2.11 

1.25 

1.39 

1.11 

1.50 

2005: Q4

1.41 

1.63 

1.03 

2.69 

3.55 

2.11 

1.21 

1.45 

1.16 

1.54 

2005: Q3

1.39 

1.58 

1.08 

2.80 

3.90 

2.15 

1.22 

1.47 

1.23 

1.56 

2005: Q2

1.37 

1.55 

1.05 

2.86 

3.66 

2.33 

1.31 

1.50 

1.32 

1.57 

2005: Q1

1.33 

1.43 

1.12 

2.92 

3.70 

2.38 

1.35 

1.63 

1.41 

1.60 

2004: Q4

1.30 

1.38 

1.10 

3.03 

4.04 

2.33 

1.34 

1.82 

1.46 

1.64 

2004: Q3

1.44 

1.59 

1.19 

3.05 

4.07 

2.47 

1.37 

2.02 

1.57 

1.75 

2004: Q2

1.49 

1.60 

1.26 

3.10 

4.14 

2.52 

1.39 

2.29 

1.71 

1.86 

2004: Q1

1.53 

1.65 

1.25 

3.13 

4.20 

2.52 

1.27 

2.57 

1.90 

1.96 

2003: Q4

1.67 

1.78 

1.40 

3.28 

4.44 

2.61 

1.65 

2.85 

2.20 

2.15 

2003: Q3

1.67 

1.73 

1.48 

3.10 

4.23 

2.60 

1.86 

3.27 

2.57 

2.22 

2003: Q2

1.80 

1.82 

1.61 

3.31 

4.53 

2.69 

2.05 

3.56 

2.62 

2.42 

2003: Q1

1.91 

1.98 

1.67 

3.42 

4.67 

2.79 

2.09 

3.64 

2.57 

2.54 

2002: Q4

1.87 

1.97 

1.61 

3.45 

4.85 

2.70 

2.11 

3.88 

2.50 

2.57 

2002: Q3

1.98 

2.11 

1.69 

3.49 

4.89 

2.79 

2.20 

3.88 

2.55 

2.69 

2002: Q2

2.04 

2.15 

1.76 

3.51 

4.79 

2.83 

2.27 

3.92 

2.51 

2.75 

2002: Q1

2.10 

2.24 

1.78 

3.60 

4.94 

2.87 

2.38 

3.68 

2.49 

2.75 

2001: Q4

2.16 

2.23 

1.93 

3.65 

4.69 

3.07 

2.37 

3.49 

2.61 

2.74 

2001: Q3

2.17 

2.24 

1.92 

3.72 

5.00 

3.09 

2.24 

3.25 

2.80 

2.72 

2001: Q2

2.17 

2.40 

1.72 

3.67 

4.95 

2.97 

1.99 

2.93 

2.57 

2.55 

2001: Q1

2.05 

2.30 

1.60 

3.63 

4.80 

2.97 

1.85 

2.65 

2.54 

2.42 

 

Home    |     About Steven     |     On the Issues     |    News     |     Contact